Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #35770, comment 29
- Timestamp:
- Sep 19, 2012, 6:59:18 AM (12 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #35770, comment 29
initial v1 1 1 I also vote to return to the previous state, at least until there is a separate libstc++ port. 2 2 3 I agree that the instability from comment #2 is not theoretical and I can easily reproduce it. At the same time, I can easily solve the problem by stopping mixing the compilers when I compile my code. Long time ago there was already a ticket for "pointer being freed was not allocated" error, where the a suggested solution. While the solution is not really working, the key point is not mixing stuff.3 I agree that the instability from comment:2 is not theoretical and I can easily reproduce it. At the same time, I can easily solve the problem by stopping mixing the compilers when I compile my code. Long time ago there was already a ticket for "pointer being freed was not allocated" error, where the a suggested solution. While the solution is not really working, the key point is not mixing stuff. 4 4 5 Those who is not using gc4 [4-8] have no problem. Those who are using, just need to accept the fact that there is an incompatibility if compilers are mixed. The removal of std++ solve solvable problem for a subset of developers using gcc, but creates unsolvable problem for others who rely on c++11 and other new features of standard library.5 Those who is not using gc4![4-8] have no problem. Those who are using, just need to accept the fact that there is an incompatibility if compilers are mixed. The removal of std++ solve solvable problem for a subset of developers using gcc, but creates unsolvable problem for others who rely on c++11 and other new features of standard library.