Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #70434, comment 2


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 24, 2024, 3:09:11 AM (3 months ago)
Author:
ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #70434, comment 2

    v1 v2  
    33https://fossies.org/linux/misc/old/slatec_src.tgz
    44
     5{{{
    56checksums           rmd160  f4393d91e25ecd2ec0cae6b25d4b2829afcd4291
    6 
    77                    sha256  df009d9ef9c18aae06ce68711b1ae108d3533b4f174582c3cbea0915c4fdfe01
    8 
    98                    size    2373787
     9}}}
    1010number of files 1442
    1111
    12 New archive
     12New archive \\
    1313http://www.netlib.org/slatec/slatec_src.tgz
    1414
     15{{{
    1516checksums           rmd160  e72b3975dce14515ea366974c9cff4906a4b3019
    16 
    1717                    sha256  4c8c02fee905325ee4906bf8f7ece5593d895da3e5f208322f8aacea6d0eb9dc
    18 
    1918                    size    1768291
     19}}}
    2020number of files 740
    2121
    22 I am not a slatec expert so I don't know if the new archive is messed up or the pruning is intentional, but I suspect it isn't  intentional.  One short term solution is to change the master_sites in the Portfile, but the currently listed site is supposed to be the correct master.
     22I am not a slatec expert so I don't know if the new archive is messed up or the pruning is intentional, but I suspect it isn't  intentional.  One short term solution is to change the `master_sites` in the Portfile, but the currently listed site is supposed to be the correct master.