Opened 16 years ago
Last modified 2 years ago
#16357 assigned defect
xemacs-21.4.21 newer port looks much worse than older port?
| Reported by: | schneck@… | Owned by: | dstrubbe (David Strubbe) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Low | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 1.6.0 |
| Keywords: | xemacs font sumo mule | Cc: | cooljeanius (Eric Gallager) |
| Port: | xemacs |
Description
The older port of xemacs (which I installed +sumo but without mule) looks good to me The newer port (which automatically comes with sumo and mule) looks bad---the font just looks poor in comparison, as if poorly bitmapped or something...
Is this something to do with mule? Perhaps a no_mule option for those who want sumo but not mule could be made available.
Change History (6)
comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Cc: | mww@… removed |
|---|---|
| Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to mww@… |
| Port: | xemacs added |
comment:2 Changed 16 years ago by schneck@…
comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
| Owner: | changed from mww@… to macports-tickets@… |
|---|
comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
| Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to dstrubbe |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:6 Changed 2 years ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
| Cc: | cooljeanius added |
|---|
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
I verified today (2009-03-05) that XEmacs from MacPorts looks very different with and without mule support.
I also figured out what to add to my .xemacs/init.el to get the mule version to look the same as the non-mule version:
(set-face-font 'default '("-*-courier-medium-r-*-*-*-120-*"))