Opened 16 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
#17253 closed enhancement (fixed)
libtasn1 no longer provides libtasn1-config, let's provide one until depending packages are fixed
Reported by: | bugs@… | Owned by: | sfiera@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | erkinbah@…, ohler+macports@…, mww@…, usx303@… | |
Port: | libtasn1 |
Description
See [41968] and #17197 for examples where this is causing problems. Since it will take some time to find all the broken packages and make them not broken, perhaps the following script should be installed into /opt/local/bin/libtasn1-config and set executable as part of the libtasn1 installation:
#!/bin/bash if [[ $1 == "--libs" ]]; then echo "-L/opt/local/lib -ltasn1" fi if [[ $1 == "--cflags" ]]; then echo "-I/opt/local/include" fi if [[ $1 == "--version" ]]; then echo "1.6" fi
This will allow things to work until ports get tracked down and updated.
Here's a better version I didn't test as well that should respect people's prefixes:
#!/bin/bash PREFIX=`cat /opt/local/etc/macports/macports.conf | grep ^prefix | cut -f 2- | xargs -n 1 echo` if [[ $1 == "--libs" ]]; then echo "-L${PREFIX}/lib -ltasn1" fi if [[ $1 == "--cflags" ]]; then echo "-I${PREFIX}/include" fi if [[ $1 == "--version" ]]; then echo "1.6" fi
Change History (14)
comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to sfiera@… |
---|
comment:2 Changed 16 years ago by bugs@…
Actually this one is substantially better as it will try and find the actual configuration file instead of just assuming it's at the standard prefix. The advantage to this being that we can actually try and actually respect prefixes instead of just pretending to. :)
#!/bin/bash IFS=":" for dir in $PATH; do if [ -e `echo ${dir}/etc/macports/macports.conf | sed s/\\\/bin//` ]; then CONF=`echo ${dir}/etc/macports/macports.conf | sed s/\\\/bin//` fi done if [ ! -e ${CONF} ]; then echo "No configuration for macports found" exit fi PREFIX=`cat ${CONF} | grep ^prefix | cut -f 2- | xargs -n 1 echo` if [[ $1 == "--libs" ]]; then echo "-L${PREFIX}/lib -ltasn1" fi if [[ $1 == "--cflags" ]]; then echo "-I${PREFIX}/include" fi if [[ $1 == "--version" ]]; then echo "1.6" fi
comment:3 follow-up: 4 Changed 16 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
Why not use pkg-config in the script? Then there's no need to jump through hoops or hardcode values.
comment:4 Changed 16 years ago by bugs@…
Replying to jmr@…:
Why not use pkg-config in the script? Then there's no need to jump through hoops or hardcode values.
That sounds like exactly what should be done... as for why I didn't do it, well, didn't really know about it. :)
#!/bin/bash if [[ $1 == "--libs" ]]; then echo `pkg-config --libs libtasn1` fi if [[ $1 == "--cflags" ]]; then echo `pkg-config --cflags libtasn1` fi if [[ $1 == "--version" ]]; then echo `pkg-config --version libtasn1` fi
Better?
comment:6 Changed 16 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
But is pkg-config --version
different to libtasn1-config --version
? Might need to translate --version to --modversion.
comment:9 Changed 16 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
I fixed gnome-keyring using the patch from http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=560869 in r42286. Are there any other ports that need libtasn1-config?
comment:10 follow-up: 11 Changed 16 years ago by dbevans (David B. Evans)
Cc: | mww@… usx303@… added |
---|
Additional ports that depend on libtasn1 are:
irc/bitlbee mail/msmtp net/gloox security/libprelude sysutils/ntfsprogs textproc/iksemel
Ccing maintainers of msmtp and libprelude. Rest are nomaintainer.
comment:11 Changed 16 years ago by dbevans (David B. Evans)
Replying to devans@…:
Additional ports that depend on libtasn1 are:
irc/bitlbee mail/msmtp net/gloox security/libprelude sysutils/ntfsprogs textproc/iksemel
None of these use libtasn1-config but rather use libgnutls-config and gnutls was fixed in r41968. The dependency on libtasn1 in these files is therefore superfluous -- a dependency on gnutls is sufficient.
comment:12 Changed 15 years ago by (none)
Milestone: | Port Enhancements |
---|
Milestone Port Enhancements deleted
comment:13 Changed 15 years ago by blb@…
Are there any ports remaining that would need this, or should we close this?
comment:14 Changed 14 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Assuming this isn't a problem any more based on lack of response to comment:13.
Assigning to maintainer.