#38580 closed defect (fixed)
ufraw @0.19.2: checksum mismatch
Reported by: | deesto (John S. De Stefano Jr.) | Owned by: | dbevans (David B. Evans) |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 2.1.3 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt), tgederberg | |
Port: | ufraw |
Description
DEBUG: Executing org.macports.checksum (ufraw) Error: Checksum (sha256) mismatch for ufraw-0.19.2.tar.gz Error: Checksum (rmd160) mismatch for ufraw-0.19.2.tar.gz Error: org.macports.checksum for port ufraw returned: Unable to verify file checksums DEBUG: Error code: NONE DEBUG: Backtrace: Unable to verify file checksums while executing "$procedure $targetname" DEBUG: couldn't open "/System/Library/Frameworks/Tcl.framework/Versions/8.5/Resources/tclIndex": no such file or directory while executing "open [file join $dir tclIndex]" Error: Unable to upgrade port: 1
Attachments (2)
Change History (11)
Changed 12 years ago by deesto (John S. De Stefano Jr.)
Attachment: | ufraw-port-upgrade.log added |
---|
comment:1 Changed 12 years ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)
Cc: | deesto removed |
---|---|
Keywords: | checksum mismatch error removed |
Resolution: | → worksforme |
Status: | new → closed |
Summary: | ufraw checksum verification error → ufraw @0.19.2: checksum mismatch |
The distfile checks out fine for me. Maybe they had a temporary hosting issue.
comment:3 follow-up: 4 Changed 12 years ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
It's still failing for me...
comment:4 follow-up: 6 Changed 12 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)
Resolution: | worksforme |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
Replying to egall@…:
It's still failing for me...
I double-checked my debug output; I was originally getting the distfile from a MacPorts mirror. The SourceForge download does have a checksum issue.
comment:5 Changed 12 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)
Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to devans@… |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → new |
Looks like a stealth update.
comment:6 Changed 12 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
comment:7 Changed 12 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Cc: | ryandesign@… added |
---|
Looks like they just updated the autotools files to newer versions:
$ diff -rq ufraw-0.19.2 0.19.2_1/ufraw-0.19.2 Files ufraw-0.19.2/config.guess and 0.19.2_1/ufraw-0.19.2/config.guess differ Files ufraw-0.19.2/config.sub and 0.19.2_1/ufraw-0.19.2/config.sub differ Files ufraw-0.19.2/depcomp and 0.19.2_1/ufraw-0.19.2/depcomp differ Files ufraw-0.19.2/install-sh and 0.19.2_1/ufraw-0.19.2/install-sh differ Files ufraw-0.19.2/missing and 0.19.2_1/ufraw-0.19.2/missing differ
Changed 12 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Attachment: | ufraw.diff added |
---|
difference between the old 0.19.2 and the new 0.19.2
comment:8 follow-up: 9 Changed 12 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Cc: | tgederberg@… added |
---|---|
Resolution: | → fixed |
Status: | new → closed |
Updated in r104658. I didn't update the checksums because I don't think these changes affect the files that end up getting installed.
comment:9 Changed 12 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
I can reproduce this. My output looks like this: